{"id":2034,"date":"2005-10-23T17:00:00","date_gmt":"2005-10-23T07:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/new.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/traffic-lights-and-the-economics-of-running-them\/"},"modified":"2014-10-10T12:30:39","modified_gmt":"2014-10-10T01:30:39","slug":"traffic-lights-and-the-economics-of-running-them","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/2034","title":{"rendered":"Traffic Lights and the Economics of Running them"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Hmm&#8230; When I was out today I saw some LED traffic lights. These are lights with LED&#8217;s instead of normal light globes. It is interesting to look at the economics of Traffic Lights, normal and LED.<\/p>\n<p>Firstly, lets look at power consumption. A standard intersection has four lights pointed in each direction. Each of these would be 60-100W. Lets assume that they are all 100W right now for the ease of the maths. So there are 16 lights on at any time. Oops, I am wrong. There are another eight for pedestrians. So we have a total of 24 lights on at any time, out of a total of  64 lights(16 * 3 + 8 * 2 = 64).<\/p>\n<p>Assuming that a set of traffic lights runs 24 hours a day ( and most do) and ignoring the computer inside, this adds up to 2400W 24\/7. Assuming electricity is 10c \/ KW\/h, this comes to about $5.76 per day. Lets just round that down to $5.48 for simplicity. Multiplied by 365 days, this comes to $2000 per year for electricity to run the lights. Hmm, that is not cheap. LED Lights have got to be cheaper to run than that. <\/p>\n<p>Assuming that LED&#8217;s draw 10W per globe instead of 100W, the saving are incredible. So rather than costing $2000\/year they now cost only $200\/year in electricity. A huge improvement.<\/p>\n<p>But that is not the main reason for replacing globes with LED&#8217;s. Lets keep looking. Most globes have a 5,000 hour life. The orange is rarely on, so we can ignore it at the moment&#8230; The RED and GREEN are equally as probable to have on. So on average, a globe will fail after 10,000 hours in service. This sounds like a lot, but it is not as there are 8,000 hours in a year. Lets assume that they are using some advanced techniques to get 12,000 hours out of each globe. Now, there are 16 main globes (ignoring the pedestrians) meaning that a globe will blow about six times a year. Twelve times a year is a lot!<\/p>\n<p>Lets think about the cost of this. You need to send a team to replace the globes. A team of two might be able to work about 1200 hours a year, and replace one globe every hour including getting set up, and then moving to the next job. At $50K\/year each, with a 2.5* multiplier, they cost about $250K per team of two, in order to replace 1200 lights. This comes to about $208 per globe. <\/p>\n<p>That means replacing lightglobes in each traffic light will cost about $2500\/year!<\/p>\n<p>Moving to LED globes means that if an LED fails, it does not need to be replaced. It is only when a large number of pixels fail that they need to be swapped out. This is probably after at least 10 years when they would be wanting to do other maintainence anyway. <\/p>\n<p>So, lets compare the costs. Normal lights cost $2000 in electricity, and $2500 in repairs each year. LED lights cost $200 in electricity a year, and $0 in repairs each year. I am guessing that each LED &#8216;GLOBE&#8217; costs $30, so the increase in cost once off would be $30 * 64 or about $2000. You can save more in six months with LED traffic lights than standard globes.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hmm&#8230; When I was out today I saw some LED traffic lights. These are lights with LED&#8217;s instead of normal light globes. It is interesting to look at the economics of Traffic Lights, normal and LED. Firstly, lets look at &hellip;<\/p>\n<p class=\"read-more\"> <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/2034\"> <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Traffic Lights and the Economics of Running them<\/span> Read More &raquo;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","enabled":false}}},"categories":[],"tags":[],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p5cfmK-wO","_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2034"}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2034"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2034\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.radio-active.net.au\/web3\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}